by Karlene Lukovitz
by Aaron Baar
by Karl Greenberg
by Karlene Lukovitz
by Aaron Baar
by Karl Greenberg
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post

A bunch of numbers from RBR.com. Individual results will vary, (I like those disclaimers!):
A new study from Harris Interactive says that television ads are considered the most helpful to Americans, while Internet banner ads are the most ignored by the public. For radio ads, only nine percent of respondents said they ignore them. However, 46% said they ignore online banner ads.
Over one-third of Americans (37%) say that television ads are most helpful in making their purchase decision while 17% say newspaper ads are most helpful and 14% say the same about Internet search engine ads. Radio ads (3%) and Internet banner ads (1%) are not considered helpful by many people. Over one-quarter of Americans (28%), however, say that none of these types of advertisements are helpful to them in the purchase decision making process. Half of people aged 18-34 (50%) say television ads are most helpful while three in ten (31%) of those aged 55 and older say they find newspaper ads to be most helpful. There is also a slight regional difference. Two in five Southerners (40%) say they find television ads most helpful, while only one-third (33%) of Midwesterners feel the same.
Almost half of Americans (46%) say they tend to ignore Internet banner ads. Much further down the list are Internet search engine ads (17% of people ignore), television ads (13%), radio ads (9%), and newspaper ads (6%). One in ten Americans (9%) say they do not ignore any of these types of ads. There are age and regional differences. Half of those aged 35-44 (50%) and 51% of Midwesterners say they ignore Internet banner ads compared to 43% of 18-34 year olds as well as Easterners and Southerners. One in five Americans 18-34 years old (20%) say they ignore Internet search engine ads while 20% of those aged 55+ say they ignore television ads.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Advertising, demographics

It's dangerous and could be fatal:
What Happens If You Cut Media Spending?
Predictive Modeling by ThinkVine Indicates One Brand Would Never Close Sales Gap
In the short term, marketers can get away with cutting media spending without much real harm. But that term is as short as a quarter, and the harm, once it begins, can last long after the media switch gets turned back on.
Those are recent findings of ThinkVine, a Cincinnati analytics firm that does predictive media modeling for marketers such as PepsiCo, MillerCoors and Colgate-Palmolive Co. ThinkVine CEO Damon Ragusa said lately he's been getting a lot of inquiries about the potential impact of going dark altogether for a quarter or more.
An analysis the firm did for one unnamed brand looked at the impact of turning off media entirely for a year, then turning it back on the next year at prior levels. For about 16 weeks, sales volume was about the same. By the end of year one, however, sales volume was about 20 percent lower without media than with it.
Turning media back on in year two reversed the sales decline as the brand began growing again at the same rate it would have otherwise. But it never closed the gap in sales results compared with what it would have achieved had it maintained media spending both years.
Different brands respond differently to media cuts, Mr. Ragusa said, and some brands with dominant positions or in less advertising-responsive categories may get away with cutting budgets unscathed. But for many, possibly most, getting back sales and share lost from cutting budgets can be a lengthy and expensive process.
"There is a downside risk," he said. "The cost of getting back what you lose is often greater than the savings."
A brand that is on a downward trajectory anyway because of the economy is much more at risk from a temporary withdrawal of media support than one with flat or rising sales growth, he added.
ThinkVine uses correlation and regression analysis and sales data. But it bases its predictions on the makeup of each brand's consumers, including detailed data on the media and spending habits of various consumer segments. It then crunches as many as a trillion data points for each forecast.
The results aren't perfect but tend to come within 2.4 percent of the real-world sales data in ThinkVine's validation work, Mr. Ragusa said.
(Source: Advertising Age, 06/29/09)
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Advertising
Coming up in a few months, I will be doing a presentation on Social Marketing and Social Media to a group of local business owners and marketing directors.
Despite significant growth in the number of Twitter accounts since last year, 53% of those who have registered with the much-publicized micro-blogging service have no followers, 56% are not following anyone, and 55% have never even tweeted, according to a report fromHubSpot.
The firm’s “June 2009 State of the Twittersphere,” which is a follow-up to the firm’s Q408 effort, found that more than 9% of Twitter users are completely inactive, meaning they have fewer than 10 followers, fewer than 10 friends and fewer than 10 updates.
Additional findings:
Active Users are Regular Tweeters
In contrast to those who don’t use Twitter much, HubSpot did find that a large portion of individuals who are actively using Twitter have embraced it, and are tweeing on a regular basis.
Usage findings:
HubSpot also reported that the distribution of following and follower numbers falls into a pattern very similar to a power-law or “long tail” curve.
Growth Becomes Exponential
There are, however, dramatic differences in Twitter statistics between last year’s report and this one. In Q408, HubSpot reported that Twitter was growing at a rate of 5,000 - 10,000 new accounts per day. That rate has since accelerated and it has reached a point where it is “futile to attempt to generate a flat growth rate number.”
Twitter Used to Interact & Communicate
The content of tweets that are posted by users reveals that users are frequently using Twitter to interact and communicate with other users rather than just answer the “What are you doing?” question.
HubSpot also noted that many users often reach the 140-character limit in an attempt to get as much content as possible into every update.
Most Tweets During Business Hours
The distribution of posting over days and times-of-day reveals that business hours during the business week in the US are the most popular, the report said.
London Remains Most Popular Locale
Because the location field on Twitter profiles does not contain any structured data, HubSpot reported that it is difficult to create an accurate picture of location distribution. However, the list of the top thirty most common phrases people type into their location section on their bio provides basic directional guidance. It points to the fact that Twitter seems to be most popular in major English-speaking urban areas, particularly London, large US cities and those in Canada:
Possible Underutilization
The study also found that since Twitter has implemented a limit to the number of users an account can follow (a maximum of 2000 when the user has less than 2,000 followers) there is a large number of users who are following exactly 2,000 users, possibly indicating that many active users are intentionally trying to gain as many followers as possible to increase their reach.
“Recently, there has been a lot of buzz from mainstream media about the growth of Twitter,” said Brian Halligan, CEO and co-founder of HubSpot. “However, the [report] points out that people may not be using Twitter to its full potential. If new users aren’t really engaged, should it really be considered growth?”
About the report: HubSpot’s June 2009 State of the Twittersphere analyzed TwitterGrader data from more than 4.5 million Twitter accounts over a nine month period to measure Twitter growth and report statistics on tweets, the Twitter user base and user geography.
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: marketing, social media
I could have broken this into three sales tips, but, I decided to give it to you the way it arrived in my email from Jill Konrath:
Top Sales Resources, June 2009
Posted: 30 Jun 2009 06:27 AM PDT
Selling to Big Companies
An Interview with Jill Konrath
David Wolf from Smallbiz America asks me lots of questions about how entrepreneurs can land bigger corporate clients. As you might imagine, I have a few things to say! Click here to listen in.Don't Cold Call, Social Call
By Nigel Edelshain, Sales 2.0
Learn how to prospect with Sales 2.0 tools and social networks. Just one of the techniques in this ebook causes an approximately 8x improvement over a cold call. Click here to get your free copy.
Top Sales Experts Share Their Top Articles
This free ebook features articles by a whole bunch of people whose work I respect: Mark Hunter, Lori Richardson, Kelley Robertson, Jonathan Farrington, Colleen Francis, Jonathan London, Kendra Lee, Ken Thoreson, Nancy Bleeke, George Huang, Danita Bye & more. I could go on & on!
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: sales training
From Mediapost:
by Sarah Mahoney
by Tanya Irwin
by Aaron Baar
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: marketing, Media Post
Jon Gibs, vice president, media and agency insights, Nielsen Online, notes "We have seen major growth in Facebook... and a subsequent decline in MySpace. Twitter... (is) perhaps changing the outlook for the entire space... regardless of how fast a site is growing... it can quickly fall out of favor with consumers... (who) are willing to pick up their networks and move them to another platform... at a moment's notice."
| Top 10 Social Networking and Blog Sites (April 2009 U.S. Home and Work) | |||
| Site | Apr-08 Total Minutes (000) | Apr-09 Total Minutes (000) | Year-over-Year Percent Growth |
| | 1,735,698 | 13,872,640 | 699% |
| Myspace.com | 7,254,645 | 4,973,919 | -31 |
| Blogger | 448,710 | 582,683 | 30 |
| Tagged.com | 29,858 | 327,871 | 998 |
| Twitter.com | 7,865 | 299,836 | 3712 |
| MyYearbook | 131,105 | 268,565 | 105 |
| LiveJournal | 54,671 | 204,121 | 273 |
| | 119,636 | 202,407 | 69 |
| SlashKey | N/A | 187,687 | N/A |
| Gaia Online | 173,115 | 143,909 | -17 |
| Source: Nielsen NetView | |||
April was the fourth month in a row that Facebook held the top spot in both unique visitors and total minutes, but Myspace has been winning in online video with 120.8 million video streams.
Myspace visitors spent 384 million minutes viewing video on the site, with an average of 38.8 minutes per viewer. In comparison, Facebook visitors spent only 113.5 million minutes viewing video in April, with an average of 11.2 minutes per video viewer.
| Top 5 Social Networking and Blog Sites Ranked (April 2009, U.S. Home and Work) | ||
| Site | Total Video Streams (000) | Time Spent Viewing (Minutes x 000) |
| Myspace.com | 120,793 | 384,030 |
| | 41,537 | 113,502 |
| Stickam | 19,617 | 54,522 |
| FunniestStuff.net | 10,206 | 34,456 |
| Funny or Die | 6,503 | 17,725 |
| Source: Nielsen VideoCensus, June 2009 | ||
Gibs concludes, "... maybe the better question to ask is who does each site reach, not who is 'winning'... and how are they building for the future to maintain the loyalty of their visitors, who to this point have shown little long-term loyalty to any specific platform."
For more information, please visit Nielsen Online here.
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: social media
Living a connected, collective and spontaneous life is a fundamental Hispanic value and desire. Technology that facilitates connecting, sharing, entertaining and learning is rapidly becoming indispensable for the majority of Hispanics. We are referring to those that are connecting on their computers; recent figures put 57% of Hispanics going online through their mobile phones.
2.The growing Hispanic middle class is super connected: 88% of Hispanics with a household income of $50,000 + are online.
For categories such as technology, consumer electronics, financial services and travel, connecting with consumers where they explore your products, research options, share experiences with communities, and ultimately buy your products is not option, it's a necessity.
3.Hispanics are early adopters of mobile technology: 31 million have a mobile phone. By the age of 15, penetration of wireless services is 64%, by 17, it rises to 78%. Hispanics have the highest proportion of cord-cutters among all segments.
For the most part, mobile marketing is not really on the radar as a consistent Hispanic marketing strategy. The challenge and opportunity of mobile marketing seems to lie in truly capitalizing on the relationship people have with their mobile devices. The mobile phone is not just another screen onto which we can send ads. It represents an opportunity for us to fundamentally change the relationship between brand and consumer.
4.Hispanics will spend money on what they really want: They spend 42% more on mobile devices and 35% more on data services than the average user.
Convention tells us that the Hispanic market is very value-conscious and often makes purchase decisions based on price. When it comes to technology, the opposite has proven to be true.
5.Roughly half of the Hispanics online prefer Spanish, and for 66% it's important to be recognized as Hispanic through culturally relevant content.
Online Hispanics move from Spanish to English and back again in different moments of an interactive brand experience. And far from being a disadvantage, this kind of fluid activity opens up interesting opportunities that help us learn about our consumers while allowing them to customize their online experience.
6.Hispanics are dynamic content creators and consumers: Two-thirds of online Hispanics use the Web to view other consumers' content and 40% create content and provide their opinions online.
Initially generated due to a lack of relevant and in-language content, consumer-generated content in the Hispanic market has taken on a life of its own. Hispanics dramatically outpace the general market in creating and sharing content, and few brands have figured out how to be part of the process creatively. The challenge is to support consumers, provide resources and even become part of the process without imposing artificial restrictions or values.
7.Entertainment content main appeal for online engagement: 37% listen to Internet radio vs. just 30% of non-Hispanics and 36% download music vs. just 29% of non-Hispanics.
They represent a captive consumer that is willing to spend time and in many cases, money for entertainment content online.
8.An online collective life: 77% engage in some kind of online socializing. And 40% are part of a social network. An estimated 20% of Hispanics online are considered "Hispanic-fluentials."
If word of mouth is key to any successful Hispanic marketing initiative, the online space has taken the dynamic to another level. Online, the collective, hyper-social Hispanic cultural dynamic can be expressed, explored and developed without limits.
9.Multi-tasking: Part of the Hispanic DNA. On average, Hispanics spend 17 hours per week online, but they spend 14 hours per day with a technology device (versus 8 hours for the general population).
The big opportunity: moving focus from one screen to three, dynamically connected screens. Because of their higher propensity to use converged technology, this consumer is the perfect target for developing truly integrated multi-channel campaigns.
10. Hispanic online landscape is less crowded: Interactive Advertising Media Investment represented 4.6% in 2007, while in the general market, it is around 7%.
The online Hispanic opportunity is not only about a big and growing market, or about consumers that are eager to engage. Brands that go in first and engage the consumer first have a unique opportunity to establish themselves as first movers and true resources for Hispanic consumers.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: demographics, internet, marketing
"How are you getting along?" asked the old timer of the new sales rep. "Not so good," came his disgusted reply. "I've been insulted in every place I made a call." "That's funny," said the old timer. "I've been on the road 40 years. I've had my samples flung in the street, been tossed downstairs, man-handled by janitors and rolled in the gutter. But insulted—never!" We all deal with rejection differently. But if you're in the sales game, you better get used to it because rejection is—and always will be—part of business. If it was easy to succeed in sales, everyone would want in. Rejection helps knock out the weak. In doing my homework before corporate speeches, I often talk to the company's head of sales and ask what skills are necessary for a good sales rep in their industry. Dealing with rejection is always on the list because not everyone can handle all the rejections that are necessary in order to be successful. Too many people just give up. They don't realize that in order to get the yeses, you must hear the nos. Here is my advice in dealing with rejection, because Lord knows, I've had plenty over my career: Two men wrote a book containing a collection of inspirational stories. The two authors figured it would take about three months to find a publisher. What happened next is as inspirational as any of the stories in their book. The first publisher they approached said, "NO." The second publisher said "NO." The third publisher said, "NO." The next 30 publishers said, "NO." Altogether, they received 33 rejections over a period of three years. So what did they do? They submitted their book to still another publisher. The 34th publisher said, "YES." After 33 rejections that one "Yes" launched the spectacular publishing success of "Chicken Soup for the Soul," written and compiled by my good friends Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen. The "Chicken Soup for the Soul" series has so far sold more than 30 million copies—all because Canfield and Hansen had the willingness to fail over and over, but to keep going until they succeeded. Mackay's Moral: Don't get dejected if you've been rejected—just get your skills perfected! Miss a column? The last three weeks of Harvey's columns are always archived online.
A great piece from Harvey Mackay:
Harvey Mackay's Column This Week
Beat rejection before it beats you ![]()
More information and learning tools can be found online at harveymackay.com.
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Harvey Mackay, sales training
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Advertising
Can you guess who this commercial is for before the end ?
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Advertising

Here's how to properly measure the Return On Sponsorship:
You Can Measure Return on Sponsorship
The sponsorship industry has advanced a great deal since the time the phrase "sponsorship can't be measured" typically went unchallenged. As all aspects of the industry have grown more sophisticated, and as the dollar value and prominence of partnerships has grown substantially, the need for accountability has become vitally important.
We are hearing questions such as: Can I measure the impact of my sponsorship activation? What is the return on my venue naming rights deal? As a property, how can I demonstrate return to the sponsors of my event? And the list goes on.
Existing approaches to measurement -- which merely transfer advertising surrogates such as media equivalencies and impressions to sponsorship, or use intermediate metrics such as awareness and attitude shifts to gauge performance -- miss the mark. They don't consider either the differences the sponsorship environment requires or the inherent flaws in the way advertising is measured.
Another issue is the challenge of measuring something for which there is no standard measurement. There is simply no escaping the fact that sponsors must customize the way they evaluate to their own situation.
Truly measuring what we call ROS -- return on sponsorship -- means linking expenditures directly to real investment returns.
Buyers of sports and other sponsorships must -- and can -- assess their partnerships based on actual outcomes rather than intermediate outputs. Instead of measuring the amount of time a sponsor's logo is visible, ROS measures how, if at all, the visibility impacts fan behavior.
Another departure: ROS is an end-to-end solution with strategic and global capability, measuring return against a client's specific, ranked objectives.
ROS contributes to the performance of any sponsorship, enhances the legitimacy of sponsorship and its standing in the internal policy debate, and provides the justification for budget increases.
The following are strategic, organizational and process-related best practices for measuring sponsorship:
Measure outcomes, not outputs: We tend to measure what's easy to measure rather than what matters. This means we end up measuring outputs -- what a sponsor got or did -- rather than outcomes -- what a sponsorship actually produced.
Define and benchmark objectives on the front end: Defining objectives at the beginning of a sponsorship shows which indicators to track.
Measure return for each objective against pro-rated share of rights fee: This allows for fairly measuring multiple objectives around each sponsorship.
Apply the assumptions and ratios used by other departments within your company: Base measurement on metrics already used and accepted internally.
Measure behavior: Retool objectives to align them with the core drivers of value for the business. No matter the brand prestige or business category, behavior shifts are critical to measure.
Measure the emotional connections: In addition to behavior numbers, accurately reflect the contact value between your brand and your target audience.
Include cost savings in your ROS calculations: Not a calculation of how much money was saved by cutting sponsorship expenses, but rather any real savings generated on sales, marketing and recruitment activities that would usually take place outside of sponsorship.
Research the emotional identities of your customers: Successful sponsorship begins with an understanding of your customers -- not as demographics, but as people.
Identify group norms: Psychological connectedness to a sports team or event represents an important aspect of self-identity, and the more a consumer identifies with an organization the more likely they are to support its sponsors.
Slice the data: Client experience reveals that sponsorship does not work equally well with all customers. It works best with those most committed, whether to the property being sponsored or to the brand.
Capture normative data: Sponsors have a dual need for both a comparative, across-the-board analysis of sponsorship activities, as well as individual program evaluation. Incorporate a two-phase structure, addressing both the primary set of objectives (affecting all sponsorships) and the secondary levels, which may be property specific.
(Source: Larry Albus, Marketing Daily, 06/22/09)
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: marketing

This applies to any type of sales:
Relationship Selling
Relationship selling, simply put, is translating all the effort you currently give to selling into building relationships with people instead. Once enough people in your marketplace know, like, and trust you, sales are the natural result.
Building relationships is something we humans do naturally. We talk on the phone, have coffee or lunch, and work or play together. When you need to make a purchase, you call someone you know. If you don't know anyone who offers that product or service, you ask the people you do know. That's how most business actually happens.
The goal of relationship selling is to know a large enough pool of people so that all the sales you need come to you, instead of you having to go out and find them.
Here are the five requirements to make relationship selling work:
1. You have to like the people you want to sell to. You need to truly enjoy their company -- this isn't something you can fake.
2. You must care about their problems, so when you tell them how your product will solve those problems, you are helping them, not selling to them.
3. You have to believe in your product or service 100 percent. You want your customers to trust you, so that means you have to be honest with them.
4. You must be patient. Relationships take time to grow, and can't be rushed. You will make sales by building relationships, but you won't get it tomorrow.
5. You need to have a plan. Building the right relationships won't happen by accident.
If the idea of relationship selling appeals to you, but you don't meet the first three requirements, there's only one way to solve the problem. You need to find a different target market, or a different product to sell.
Relationship selling is based on authenticity, genuine concern, and honesty. It's not a sales technique that can be simulated without possessing those basic qualities.
Source: Sales consultant C.J. Hayden (www.getclientsnow.com)
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: sales training
Collective Wisdom is one of several blogs I write and edit. This one is updated between 21 and 30 times a week.
I also update a personal blog twice a day. On my Really? blog, I sometimes repost articles from the DLM site like the one I'm about to share with you.
With all the focus on advertising, marketing and sales, I also want you to strive to achieve balance in your life.
Read on:
39 Ways to Live, and Not Merely Exist
Posted: 28 Jun 2009 07:59 AM PDT

![]() | Written on 6/19/2007 by Leo Babauta, a writer, a runner and a vegetarian, and the owner of Zen Habits. This article was republished on 6/28/09. | Photo Credit: hunters.green |
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: wisdom
A lesson to learn:
In a piece at The New Yorker, James Surowiecki recounts how two companies—Post and Kellogg—reacted to the Depression. "Post did the predictable thing: it reined in expenses and cut back on advertising," he writes. "But Kellogg doubled its ad budget, moved aggressively into radio advertising, and heavily pushed its new cereal, Rice Krispies."
The strategy paid off. "By 1933, even as the economy cratered," he continues, "Kellogg’s profits had risen almost thirty per cent and it had become what it remains today: the industry’s dominant player."
Surowiecki points to studies that suggest why a company that doubles down on advertising will tend to outperform competitors during economic downturns, and will often emerge stronger than before:
To explain the urge to retrench, despite this evidence, Surowiecki notes the difference between risk and uncertainty. With the former, a business can make decisions based on a likely range of outcomes; with the latter—which becomes dominant during a downturn—no one knows what to expect. "So it’s natural to focus on what you can control," he says. "[M]inimizing losses and improving short-term results. And cutting spending is a good way of doing this."
According to Surowiecki, when companies worry too much about sinking the ship with a bad decision, they might be missing the boat by letting a good opportunity pass. Your Marketing Inspiration is to remember that Miracle Whip and the iPod were both introduced during recessions.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Advertising, marketing
Daily Sales Tip: Your No. 1 Competitor
Ask salespeople to describe their number one competitor, and they'll usually come up with price-cutters or competitors who are trying to steal their best customers.
While this type of competition can be serious and annoying, it doesn't meet the criteria of a number one competitor.
The real number one may have nothing to do with outside sales competition.
The real number one competitor is the status quo. It's the mental pattern that exists in your prospect's mind, the one that says, "It makes sense for me to buy," or "It makes sense for me to do nothing. I really prefer not to buy."
Whatever the prospect is doing right now, it's what makes sense to him or her and that's all that really matters.
It's important to find ways to change the status quo, to alter the prospect's thinking. And your questions should be focused on what the prospect is actually doing right now.
Ask in terms of the past, the present and the future, then vary the questioning to include the how and the why. You may get a view of what the customer is doing now.
Buying decisions are usually made slowly -- even over extended periods.
Your goal should be to establish in the customer's mind why it's smart to do business with you and break or stop the status quo.
Source: Adapted from The #1 Sales Team, by sales trainer/author Stephan Schiffman.
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: sales training
From Mediapost:
by Karl Greenberg
by Sarah Mahoney
by Karl Greenberg
Posted by
ScLoHo (Scott Howard)
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: marketing